Because I'm pissed off, and such conversations do not bring me a pleasure at all.
I already gave you a link to this interview, but you haven't read it, apparently. Right now I don't have the opportunity to give the link again.
Yes, I know. And the remake is better.
People don't become hot lovers in a few hours without common ground. I see you ignored my part of the text where I wrote about it. The attachment that is shown in the remake looks more appropriate. What's more, technology now allows developers to show acting better, so characters don't have to make silly gestures and shout.
Christ. When you launch these games, you can see that the main menu shows both the release year of the new games and the release year of the old games as well. This is because these games are based on these titles and remake these old products.
The word "reimagining" is not a term and serves only to express the idea of developers that they willfully interpret the source material.
The remake of the first game was also never called a remake by the developers. They used a different word. But it's still a remake, because remake is a technical term.
You need to read less Wikipedia, because the "gray canon" is a concept invented by fans. Fans of any franchise in general often like to come up with a system of canons, although the Japanese names are divided into the main ones and "gaidens".
None of the developers have ever said such things. Moreover, even Wesker's Report and Resident Evil 6 refer not to specific events from these games, but to their own interpretations. Leon didn't get the pendant, which then went to HUNK, and he also never thought about suicide and didn't have much interaction with Sherry. People just like to rationalize and invent explanations. But this story has never had a strict canon, the authors just use references to establish new stories.
Great. And that's a lie, because they're canon.
