It's like they just Google "scariest horror movies of all time" and take down notes to see what they can imitate.
Movies Death Island spoilers. Credit goes to cvxfreak!
- Thread starter Caffeine Addict
- Start date
I looked on 123movies, but it's not on there. 
With the existence of this movie, ı now find the whole " No jill-leon interactions " complaints even more strange. It feels like with this movie's script, they wanted to emphasize that more than the other relationships. It's nice that they interact but the way chris-claire's relationship is handled in this movie is still disappointing in the process, it doesnt feel like it's given as much thought as focusing on the relationship between jill-leon by comparison. I like chris and claire as siblings and still deeply wished that they starred in a new numbered game story. I think this should have happened with re6, especially since during recv, the entire reason leon contacts chris is for him to find claire. And with re6, the entire script was centered around the whole idea of showing chris and leon interacting with each other. Did they even think about adding claire at any point? I wished she was in the game with her own campaign. I still want this to be done in a new numbered game story.
With all these remakes that people are asking for, surely to God, they wouldn't ignore CV.
www.vg247.com
Then again, they think it doesn't matter. Oh, it totally matters.
It is a stupid idea not to remake it, but you remade 4. Aw. Man, do I wonder about Capcom's loyalty sometimes.
*SMH.
Is there going to be a Resident Evil Code Veronica remake? Capcom isn’t turning it down
In a shareholder meeting, Capcom doesn't rule out the idea of remaking Resident Evil spin-off titles.
Then again, they think it doesn't matter. Oh, it totally matters.
It is a stupid idea not to remake it, but you remade 4. Aw. Man, do I wonder about Capcom's loyalty sometimes.
*SMH.
Is this available on any sites now?
I dont think so, ı cant find it.
Oh well. This month will hopefully go fast. 
This is not a mistake. This is part of the movie's intro, where dates and footages are randomly arranged.
What does that mean exactly? I'm not even the 1st one who pointed out, some pointed that out before me too. It still looks like a mistake, probably due to the promotions not giving the same care as the final released products like that ad thing for re4r that's released before the game.
This means that dates and footages are randomly arranged. If you watched the intro, you would have seen, for example, that the footages from Vendetta and RE6 are next to 2004.
But ı watched it. I didnt notice vendetta's date being shown as 2004 though, ı remember someone else pointing out about rerev's date also being incorrectly called as " 2004 " when chris was shown despite his portions taking place in 2005. Even ignoring the dates, they still show mistakes with leon's bio description, by saying that he got recruited into dso despite him being recruited into usstratcom and its aupit unit before that. How would he even be recruited into dso when he was one of the forming members of that along with benford in 2011?
So 2004 date is shown during chris' trailer then? While 2009 date is shown during leon's trailer. Random arrangement or not, it still doesnt feel like much care is put into that aspect but it doesnt matter much cause those are typical promotions where oversights are more likely to happen.
I thought Vendetta took place in the 2010s.
Huh?
Huh?
It takes place in 2014.
So far ada is the only playable protagonist who made multiple appearances at numbered games without being infected with anything. She doesnt appear in this movie and unlike the returning characters who appear here, she's still not infected with anything. I suppose making them infected here is an excuse to keep their appearances young despite their aging and this will mean that they will continue to appear forever. Personally ı find this idea cheap with the way it's executed in the movie.