You dont seem to overcome the reality that not everyone likes the whole idea of umbrella and wesker coming back either.
And not everyone finds leon-chris-ada boring like how you and your so called " friends " do, everyone has their own preferences.
Dont you have anything better to do other than harassing others, russker?
Are you James Berich?
Is that why you try to overcorrect someone else when they think differently other than umbrella and wesker coming back since ucorps?
And yet you called the characters boring before even though you exclude wesker from this cause for some reason, he's on some sort of a higher " tier " than just being a " character " like others?
Why do you want umbrella-wesker to come back so much?
Why cant you just move on from both of us ı still dont understand.
No but using empty and lifeless buzzwords before gatekeeping the series around that in an attempt to force others into the exact same thinking turns the fandom into that.
Come on, seriously? You're now denying what you previously said, again? Why cant you admit your problems ı still dont understand.
And with " ı can snap " , playing victim mentality now?
" Re7 saved the series " , " Re7 returned to survival horror " , " Re7 is the most re since ( insert any title released before re4 ) " , " Survival horror can only be this ( insert any pre-4 game design that's improved with and after 4 up to re6 ) "
Even though neither re7 nor any re engine game sold more than re6 but you cant admit this fact before wrongly claiming the series to be successful which it isnt. They didnt even do critically well in japan, plenty from that region ask games like re6 which they came close with re:4 but it's still not the same and it didnt even sell more than re4, let alone re6. The truth is re6 is the most successful entry of this series and anyone who denies this before making misinterpretations about the game like how plenty shitviews do are blinded by nostalgia and nothing more. Cause of obnoxious anti-re6 fans, the series cant grow anymore like how it used to be.
But guess what? Those were classic games.
So… what? Do you mean that Capcom copied Alone in the Dark, but it doesn't count because of nostalgia? What's the point?
These games copied things, CODE: Veronica copied things like Norman Bates. BIO5 copied things like Black Hawk Down. In fact, Capcom has never stopped being inspired by various films and games.
You mention so often that BIO7 has ideas from Texas Chain Saw Massacre, as if it's worse than Mikami's team stealing textures for BIO4. That's what people should be judged for, not for their inspirations.
In the past, when ethan was discussed in regards to him having no personality as well as not even having a proper character to the point of not even having a face, you mentioned how the characters also didnt have a personality before even though they did. I mentioned leon-chris-ada as an example and with leon particularly, he's considered more and more as " irrelevant " or " side character " by some as the series goes on. If leon's really an " irrelevant side character " , then why doesnt his line of service just put a bullet into his head before hiring someone else as assignments ı dont understand. I'm tired of leon being considered as " boring " or " irrelevant " from re2 to re6 with " leon continue the redfield bloodline " and " leon crashes every vehicle he touches " memes also being tiring and unfunny.
Not really.
Cause of the reasons ı said?
RE1, 2, 3 and whatnot were scary and action oriented with a perfect balance, while 4 decided to take a dump on all of that by adding in too many action elements. Thus destroying the core appeal of the series.
No. I do like RE4 and can find honest reasons to like it without roping it with the rest of the franchise. Because unlike most people, I admit I like it for what it really is, and that's action horror (and no, RE4 is not really survival horror, since slain villagers gift you way too much ammo and other supplies).