I got empathy for the writer when she said she wrote the movie to cope with the death of her parents and that made her bring back Neo and Trinity, and the movie is just that how they return, nothing more and nothing else.
Oh, yeah. I think while people were waiting for a new word in the language of cinema, what was the first film, or a new soft reboot, the film turned out to be an epilogue or afterword of Revolutions.
I remember building different theories before the premiere, but each of them was related to how the peace between people and machines was broken, so the world needed Neo to fix everything. Like the situation with Star Wars, when the 7th film deprived the 6th film of the climax status in order to delay the climax of the Skywalker storyline. I'm not a fan of this, but I've kind of come to terms with how The Matrix series can repeat this route.
And it turned out that the film broke that expectation. It turns out that the peace was not ruined, and the sacrifice of Neo and Trinity was not in vain. And the world doesn't need Neo anymore. Like some kind of messiah, I mean.
This is a rather lyrical film about how two people who were given a life by machines, which they supposedly could have deserved, do not have harmony in their being, so they are looking for this harmony throughout the film. This is a story about resurrection and love and nothing more than that.
And it's a pretty cool perspective to look at. Although I think the company will make another film, even if without Lana Wachowski, but I like the way she added a reference about it:
