How does that contradict iwao's script though?
When did I write that something contradicts Iwao's script? It's only you here and now who writes that things contradict something. I consider them consistent, on the contrary. And that's what I'm proving to people here as well.
But he's still a director.
Sure. And that's supposed to prove that he didn't write the Umbrella storyline? If that's the case, it's not true.
That's exactly my point. There didnt need to be another umbrella connected to a recurring antagonist. It would have made more sense if it was a new antagonist doing this only for him to be concluded along with his ambition in the exact same game he's introduced. That strengthens the self-contained premise, by making the stories concluded as much as possible.
I don't see a point for myself to write things about what authors should write and what they shouldn't. This is not my prerogative. I'm just a fan who is waiting for experience and discussing the continuity of the universe. As long as things are consistent and enjoyable, I'm fine with that. If they are not like that, I use my right to disagree with the developers' decisions, but I will not change something out of a sense of validation.
Exactly my point again. He utilizes that line in a story script that doesnt involve wesker's umbrella. He gives it a meaning... Despite it sadly being pointless in the end cause krauser becomes an enemy in re4 and gets defeated.
This line had nothing to do with Wesker's organization in BIO4 either. This line was related to the personal relationship between Leon and Krauser. They both understood the dark sides of the United States, which made them similar, but they saw the solution to world problems in different ways, so they were different. Suga knew this material and fleshed it out in the prequel, remaining true to the core of this idea of parallelism.
Suga knew Jack was going to die, but he still didn't find it useless. You found it useless, and I don't agree with you.
You also forgot to mention leon's scar in re6 caused by krauser's knife attack in re4 but ı can see why you intentionally did that.
Because I didn't think about it when I wrote the text? Oh, no, because you're delusional, so you think you "telepathically" understand my intentions.
But I can do it your way: you didn't write what Adam Benford and Jack Krauser have in common, and I see that you intentionally did that.
I still dont understand what you see about mikami
I'm not familiar with Mikami, nor am I familiar with any of the developers. I care about games because I'm a fan of games. You obsessively care about the fans of these games and their developers, because you found the whole world around you offensive.
