• We've completed one of the biggest updates to our forums in years and have pushed the update live! New forum structure that's all inclusive, prefix system categorizes topics per game title. More thread options such as articles, questions, deep dives, etc. Read more in the pinned thread!

General Everything Wrong With Dartigan / GCN RE Edition

I watched dartigan's recv video which he released recently. It starts off extremely terrible then becomes repetitively boring. It's more of a mocking video about the game's design elements in regards to gameplay rather than its story.

" Re4 deserves a remake cause it would more easier to do so. "

" People asked for a remake of recv cause bla bla bla. "

" Rerev2 is like recv. "

" Darkside chronicles remade recv. "

How are these sins of the game already? I dont get it.

He makes fun of the game's older design mechanics, ( Apparently it's fine for re1, re2, re3, remake but recv has a problem for him for some reason. He really goes overboard. ) makes fun of steve to the point of calling him a " school shooter " , at one point questions claire's decision of contacting leon for him to find chris so that leon can warn him, questions wesker's actions, makes a stupid twitter joke, a terrible redfield bloodline joke, at the end he says that the game's unique plot points; mainly t-veronica inside steve's body, wont be followed up again which is wrong cause darkside chronicles and re6 followed it by bringing back t-veronica.

His sentence is steve and chris apparently having canadian accents which ı didnt understand and again makes fun of protagonists for some reason.

I agree with his sins for wesker and ı also think ashford twins feel underdeveloped compared to claire and chris but ı still didnt like dartigan mocking the game's story, especially redfield siblings and steve.

I dont understand. People talk about the more action focused entries, like re6, about how they arent " survival horror " cause they are streamlined at adventure elements while focusing more on action elements than ever before and yet go ahead and make fun of recv's adventure design elements. And despite that, still go ahead and praise re7 and re engine 2 for returning to the so called " roots " somehow. Do people even know what to say? I remember dartigan praising re7 as return to roots during his sinning video.

It's more of a video about mocking recv's game design rather than its story.

" Recv is designed bad and that's why re4 will get remade cause it's more popular and a much more adored entry! " That's the impression ı got from the video.
I recently saw his video and thought he got lot of wrong with this video.

As for remaking CV, i'm not going to fight battle which deserves it the best but i will say i'd be more interested in CV more than RE4 Remake because its part of the main lore but at the same time due to how Capcom treated RE3R i would be worried if it was another cash grab

My only gripe with Code Veronica's gameplay design was that Capcom weirdly omitted that you can no longer run up the stairs like in RE3 and you are forced to press action button to ascend or descend the stairs. Another problem i had with the game itself was the huge amount of backtracking it had compared to previous games. Sure, the original games had some form of backtracking but CV takes it up to eleven. Still, i think its good RE title overall

I couldn't believe when i heard Dartigan complaining about Chris knowing how to fly jet. He was in USAF, its in the manual of the first game. Ok, i can sort of understand how its weird how Steve can fly a plane. Maybe he learned from his father, i dunno. Its not very clear to be honest.

As for Steve not being brought up again, i think he was maybe referring to Steve not coming back despite what Wesker said about him "resurrecting" someday like he did or he could've just messed with Claire. I like the plot overall in Code Veronica even if it had some flaws.
 
I recently saw his video and thought he got lot of wrong with this video.

As for remaking CV, i'm not going to fight battle which deserves it the best but i will say i'd be more interested in CV more than RE4 Remake because its part of the main lore but at the same time due to how Capcom treated RE3R i would be worried if it was another cash grab

My only gripe with Code Veronica's gameplay design was that Capcom weirdly omitted that you can no longer run up the stairs like in RE3 and you are forced to press action button to ascend or descend the stairs. Another problem i had with the game itself was the huge amount of backtracking it had compared to previous games. Sure, the original games had some form of backtracking but CV takes it up to eleven. Still, i think its good RE title overall

I couldn't believe when i heard Dartigan complaining about Chris knowing how to fly jet. He was in USAF, its in the manual of the first game. Ok, i can sort of understand how its weird how Steve can fly a plane. Maybe he learned from his father, i dunno. Its not very clear to be honest.

As for Steve not being brought up again, i think he was maybe referring to Steve not coming back despite what Wesker said about him "resurrecting" someday like he did or he could've just messed with Claire. I like the plot overall in Code Veronica even if it had some flaws.
Yeah you're right. And definitely chris was in air force so he would definitely know how to fly a harrier. It's a good reference to his past backstory and this is also referenced in re6 where he pilots a v-tol.

I dont mind the backtracking but ı still find claire's antarctic portion and chris' rockfort section boring. But ı still enjoy the game and those sections dont bother me that much. And t-078 can easily be defeated by 3 bow gas rounds and 2 acid rounds.

Steve was brought up again in darkside chronicles and t-veronica appeared in south america in 2002. But probably cause the game is an on-rail shooter and people like to downplay spinoffs all the time; ı guess many would dismiss it. Re6 later on followed it as well but ı dont think many know, remember or care about that either.

I think it has the best story from pre-4 entries but ı still prefer darkside chronicles' recv retelling. I really like darkside chronicles as a whole; it's my favourite spinoff and ı enjoy leon's narration of past events along with operation javier.

I dont need to see a re engine version of it; the game's ps3 port looks pretty impressive and makes it look like a very modern game to me. And more importantly ı really enjoy darkside chronicles. I'm not that interested for re engine 4 either but ı'm still curious about that since ı find re4's story lacking overall.
 
So ı was away from biohaze for some time and ı decided to come back after a long while. I'm gonna share an essay that ı created. It's about dartigan's video on recv.

Also THANK GOD that re6 video is gonna be released at a close date. I couldnt be any more happier...
 
Sin 1: What the hell kind of a sin is that? How is this a story criticism of this game? " Oh no the game is bad it wont get remade! " " Later standalone games recreated it! " " Re4 is perfect masterpiece so that will get remade! " What the hell?!!

Sin 2: What a stupid joke about " steroids " . Besides why does claire need to have a plan? She's a civilian and the game takes place in the same year as re2. Siblings when their relative might be in danger might act questionable. And she was sent to rockfort island to be interrogated but wesker's attack ruined umbrella's chances. Rodrigo didnt want claire to die otherwise he might have done that by himself.

Sin 3: He opened the cell cause he wanted claire to escape. You can bring him hemostat and that will affect chris' story.

Sin 4: What kind of a sin is that? There were already zombies popped out from graveyards in re3, why cant recv have these type of zombies too?

Sin 5: How is your opinion about the game being terrible a sin of this game's story? And this is a special entry, an entry that's a spinoff. It was never meant to be re3. It was going to be re2 but capcom gave it a clever title about a sibling rivalry story. Also what a long convoluted ranting about an older game's mechanics. I played both versions and they work fine. Idk what you're talking about.

Sin 6: Stop mocking steve. He's just a kid with problems. People under 18 can act like that.

Sin 7: This joke sucked.

Sin 8: It's a big island. What kind of a question is that? Darkside chronicles also explains it.

Sin 9: So characters interacting with each other is a sin now?

Sin 10: It's umbrella. They design their facilities like that. Also DID YOU JUST SIN THE OP KNIFE?!!!! ????? Seriously that thing is so badass to use; it's meant to show chris' training on claire.

Sin 11: Even if it was; why would it be surprising? Stop mocking steve.

Sin 12: This is a common complaint ı've seen with this game's story. Claire didnt tell leon to find chris immediately cause she wanted him to protect sherry and take her into safety. She was worried about them and didnt want to get them into trouble. She later on contacted leon to find chris cause she found out info about umbrella monitoring chris and didnt know who else she could trust and contact with.

Sin 13: And this is a sin... How?

Sin 14: Mocking steve again... Leave the poor kid alone.

Sin 15: Mocking an older game's design again...

Sin 16: Repeating a previous sin for no real reason.

Sin 17: I disagree. Bowgun in recv is a good improvement from claire's weapon in re2. You can even fire explosive bolts. Personally ı would have liked to see an infinite ammo unlockable for the game but ı cant really blame the game cause it's a special spinoff and that works the game rather than against it. I dont need a re engine version for it.

Sin 18: You're just mocking a injured researcher for no real reason.

Sin 19: What the hell? Why did you sin this? This was meant to introduce ashford twins.

Sin 20: Cause she doesnt need to? They are simply displayed behind glasses and might not even behave as actual guns.

Sin 21: Mocking an older game's design again and again...

Sin 22: Why would he put the guns back? How else would he be able to defend himself without weapons?

Sin 23: And what else do you want her to do?

Sin 24: Percentage mechanic was introduced in re2 though. Re3 had it too. Besides steve could have just found out extra ammo. You could have criticised the weapons not being unlockables in main story.

Sin 25: Cause he prefers automatic guns? Also what? School shooter? That has to be the worst joke ı've ever heard. Also your sin counter just increased again for some reason.

Sin 27: Cause he wanted to mock his targets? Why are villains being blinded by their arrogance bother you to the point you describe it as a sin?

Sin 28: How is this sin a criticizing of his characterization exactly?

Sin 29: So you agree about claire mocking alfred? If so why sin it? You could have deducted a sin.

Sin 30: He could have done it off-screen when the cutscene was focusing on claire.

Sin 31: Alfred isnt gay at all. Also your mocking about sugimura who tragically passed away is extremely disgusting. Same thing with you also mocking suga for some twisted reason.

Sin 32: How many times are you going to sin an older game's design?

Sin 33: Re engine 3 had this monster though. It combined hunter gamma and grave digger into one, creating a weird chicken hybrid. Besides ı dont want re engine cv either way.

Sin 34: And that's a sin how?

Sin 35: It's just cheesy acting; you have no sense of humor.

Sin 36: He could have found them off-screen. Also a typo there about " lugars " when it's " lugers " .

Sin 37: What? It's self-aware; do you even know what you're talking about?

Sin 38: Mocking steve again...

Sin 39: And? It's just a gameplay mechanic.

Sin 40: How many times are you going to mock the new antagonist for their arrogance? Wouldnt it make more sense if you deducted sins? And stop saying alfred is gay.

Sin 41: Mocking steve again and again...

Sin 42: And that's a sin how? You can control more characters in previous entries.

Sin 43: You have some serious issues.

Sin 44: Your joke sucks.

Sin 45: Mocking an older game's acting for no real reason.

Sin 46: I agree that this was reckless but what else do you want him to do? People under stress can act like that. And mocking steve again...

Sin 47: What else do you want to be explained? And why would he mention his father again?

Sin 48: Cause of umbrella? Why wouldnt they design their facility like that?

Sin 49: I disagree. X scenes of recv devalue the game's story and it especially ruins re5's story even more. Same thing with wesker's report 1 which is also pointless. You could have sinned them without mentioning any positive. Besides if wesker was seen boring as to many, including to kenichi iwao who actually created the series; then he wouldnt have been revived from the dead. I still dislike x scenes though. " Who else are you going to root for? " Claire and chris? Anyone but wesker? I would have preferred alexia to just kill wesker or something.

( After an unnecessary sin reduction and 2 valid sins about wesker's portrayal in x scenes... )

Sin 50: Mocking an older game's design again and again and again...

Sin 51: Repeating sins about gameplay design again and again and again...

Sin 52: So not only you spoil the plot twist but you also mock the animation for some reason. Besides a speculation could be drawn about the music box playing a recording before the plot twist reveal. Did that not cross to your mind?

Sin 53: So it cant be both?

Sin 54: What a stupid joke.

Sin 55: What a pointless sin.

Sin 56: Mocking an older game's design again and again and again and again...

Sin 57: These sins are so repetitive. You dont even criticise the story, you criticise the game's design so that it wont be " remade " as if the game not getting a re engine treatment is a bad thing somehow.

Sin 58: He could have missed on purpose to toy with her.

Sin 59: One of the worst jokes ı've ever heard.

Sin 60: Cause his weapon might have run out of ammo? Along with his arrogance blinding him?

Sin 61: How many times are you going to mock the game's story with pointless sins?

Sin 62: I dont want a re engine version of it.

Sin 63: And this is a sin how?

Sin 64: There could have been other planes, including the ones that would carry t-virus which is the reason antarctic base gets infected.

Sin 65: His father could have trained him? Why is this so surprising? Chris and jill worked in air force and delta force respectively when they were quite young too.

Sin 66: This has to be the worst nitpick ı've ever seen.

Sin 67: Cause he was toying with them? Sending t-078 would decrease their chances of surviving. This is shown in gameplay since the boss fights with the tyrant, especially in plane are quite difficult. While inside the plane; 3 bow gas rounds and 2 acid rounds can defeat it fast before it would be launched.

Sin 68: What is your problem? They were showing signs of relief.

Sin 69: What kind of a sin is this? If she didnt want chris to come and reunite with her; then she wouldnt get herself into trouble on purpose in the 1st place. And ı dont think radio would even work, alfred might jam it up.

Sin 70: It has nails though. It could have followed claire off-screen and just grab onto the plane before opening the cockpit.

Sin 71: How is your opinion about this boss fight a sin of this game's story? If you knew how to fight it right from the start; wouldnt it be anti-climactic? The previous trick works well for it.

Sin 72: She was just mocking alfred. You could have deducted a sin.

Sin 73: Cause he wanted alexia to kill them in case he failed to do so? At least capture them? If he let them leave; that would have gotten alexia into trouble. He needed alexia's protection.

Sin 74: I agree that this scene is unnecessary but to give steve the benefit of doubt; he doesnt even kiss claire. He stops after claire starts to wake up. Idk why people mock that tragic kid over and over.

Sin 75: Yeah? Why is this so surprising? As if you cant blow nikolai's chopper in re3 or something.

Sin 76: Why would they die from a crash? That would be anti-climactic.

Sin 77: You're gross. He wanted to protect claire. And that redfield bloodline meme sucks.

Sin 78: The other planes carrying t-virus spread it all over the base. Due to an accident basically. And why wouldnt alfred want to do that?

Sin 79: Alexia? That was easy. Your mocking about the game's story doesnt make you any better.

Sin 80: This has to be one of the dumbest things ı've ever heard. How the hell can they escape from the back of the plane? They would have froze to death. Remember they are inside. They later find a snowmobile anyway.

Sin 81: I agree that this is also unnecessary but steve's meant to be a kid with mind issues. Stop mocking kids who have problems.

Sin 82: Cause she wants to save him? She didnt want him to die.

Sin 83: She does. You need to examine the hole in order to know the shape. You admit your sin is pointless and yet you still sin it. Pointless.

Sin 84: It does. She takes off the mask after the gas has been completely destroyed.

Sin 85: Why did you sin this awesome scene? You should have removed a sin.

Sin 86: He escaped cause of alfred's scream. He was affected by it.

Sin 87: I can. See sin 65.

Sin 88: I agree that they arent dressed properly for the weather but to give the game's story benefit; ı believe they dont complain cause of steve's love towards claire as well as claire's adoration towards her brother. They dont need to complain unnecessarily due to that, that would take away from the game's story.

Sin 89: Did you forget nosferatu attacking steve? Of course steve would have died from the fall due to that.

Sin 90: I agree that the sniper rifle is clunky but it's still a pretty good boss fight with unique scenes to kill nosferatu. Also you're complaining about an older game's design for some reason.

Sin 91: You didnt understand what he said at all. It was foreshadowing his tragic fate.

Sin 92: Why did you sin this? You should have removed a sin. And misspelling alfred's name as " alfed " for no real reason.

Sin 93: You pretty much answered yourself. She captured them in an attempt to toy with them as her experiments. She wasnt taking revenge on them, she doesnt love alfred nor anyone else. She's extremely selfish and egotistical who's portrayed as sympathetic due to her insane intelligence driving her insane to infinite heights.

Sin 94: What a pointless sin.

Sin 95: Why couldnt she? They were near their base.

Sin 96: It's not completely intact though. It's been heavily damaged. But ı agree that chris' rockfort section is unnecessary. Darkside chronicles solves that issue for me.

Sin 97: How is this a sin? It's a pretty good moment in the story. And you already criticised gulp worm before.

Sin 98: Repeating pointless sins.

Sin 99: Cause of her arrogance blinding her? Wesker could have shown it to the other monitors too.

Sin 100: You could have simply sinned wesker's changed line in x version and ı would have agreed with you.

Sin 101: You... Pretty much answered yourself.

Sin 102: Come on why did you sin this? He wanted chris to come to rockfort and he gets blinded by his arrogance. X version devalues this.

Sin 103: He pretty much explains it to chris. And he didnt say chris is the only ex-stars member who destroyed his plans. But ı agree that wesker's utilization in the stories set after re1 is quite barebones and that devalues him as well as valenfield's relationship.

Sin 104: You're still sinning this scene? Seriously?

Sin 105: You mean only chris? In og version; wesker doesnt attack claire. And alexia's charming voice influenced his mind.

Sin 106: He was in air force before joining stars. One of the worst if not the worst sin ever.

Sin 107: You pretty much answered yourself. And chris could have found antarctic base through checking one of v-tol's manuals or something. The facilities are connected.

Sin 108: Why? They are zombies. They can appear from anywhere.

Sin 109: Alexia didnt kill claire cause she wanted steve to kill her. She was using them as her experiments. And why does she need to know about chris? Your jokes suck.

Sin 110: You have some serious issues. You're just sinning redfield siblings' reunion for no real reason.

Sin 111: What a convoluted sin.

Sin 112: You're still pointlessly mocking this game's well crafted story. This video has no real reason to exist.

Sin 113: Your sinning video is stupid; not sugimura's or suga's writing. You're a disgusting sicko who mocks brilliant minds who did a lot of work for their scripts. Their story scripts didnt deserve the unnecessary criticisms at all.

Sin 114: You're still pointlessly mocking steve for no real reason. You need professional help.

Sin 115: Mocking an older game's design for yet another time that ı lost count how many.

Sin 116: You could have just sinned this and ı would have agreed with you. But it's not even that difficult to do like you're describing.

Sin 117: I dont think you understood alexia's intention at all. She wanted steve to attack and kill claire.

Sin 118: How is your opinion about this game's boss fight a sin of this game's story? I didnt even have much problem with this boss fight at all.

Sin 119: You're a disgusting sicko who mocks a small kid dying. I agree that him expressing his love is unnecessary but it was still a very emotional moment. And that line in rerev2 is a localization mistake. Claire doesnt reference it in og japanese script at all.

Sin 120: If you would have checked the files, you would understand it. And alexia dooming herself to failure is meant to be ironic. Her insane intelligence boost drove her insane and she didnt know what she was doing due to her arrogance blinding her to infinite heights.

Sin 121: Why is that a bad thing though? Kenichi iwao, the actual creator of the series who developed the scenario for re1, worked on that franchise as writer. I fail to see how sugimura playing tribute to him was a bad thing.

Sin 122: Why didnt you sin x version changing the game's story? I would have fully agreed with you!

Sin 123: What a pointless sin.

Sin 124: Chris told claire to go cause steve attacked her without chris being nearby and he wanted her to be in safety due to this. Suga expanded from sugimura's script by making redfield siblings fight steve together before fighting alexia as a coop sequence but sugimura's script still makes sense for what it is. Dismissing x version of course.

Sin 125: I agree about the weapon's mechanic being clunky but to be fair to the game; you only need to hit alexia once and she will get blown up.

Sin 126: Why are you mocking the protagonists? You could have just sinned x version altering sugimura's script due to kato's drunken nonsense.

Sin 127: Yes it does. T-veronica comes back in darkside chronicles 4 years later before re6 gives the screentime it deserves along with g-virus. Suga was expanding from sugimura's script properly. Better than re code plagas spinoff like games that are presented as numbered entries.

Sin 128: You're a disgusting idiot, you're just mocking the game's story due to wesker pissing off claire for an unnecessary reason. You could have just sinned x version's alterations and ı would have agreed with you.

Sin 129: Chris along with jill encounters wesker in prelude to the fall manga which is a prequel to umbrella chronicles' 2003 portion.

Sin 130: What about dead aim? That's the 1st actual game in the series that takes place at a year set after 1998. Re4 isnt even the 1st game that does a year time skip. And umbrella didnt even receive the proper conclusion anyway, the revival plot comes out of nowhere in re4 due to x version altering sugimura's script. I'm sure kato would have been happy by his crappy fanfiction being taken seriously.

This video is as bad as your 1st re video about re6 if NOT WORSE! I managed to pretty much respond all of your sins which is surely saying something. Even at your video about re6; ı still struggled to respond some of them properly. I'm sure the counterpoint video that will be released in the future as a respond to yours will improve from my essay very well.
 
Sin 1: What the hell kind of a sin is that? How is this a story criticism of this game? " Oh no the game is bad it wont get remade! " " Later standalone games recreated it! " " Re4 is perfect masterpiece so that will get remade! " What the hell?!!

Sin 2: What a stupid joke about " steroids " . Besides why does claire need to have a plan? She's a civilian and the game takes place in the same year as re2. Siblings when their relative might be in danger might act questionable. And she was sent to rockfort island to be interrogated but wesker's attack ruined umbrella's chances. Rodrigo didnt want claire to die otherwise he might have done that by himself.

Sin 3: He opened the cell cause he wanted claire to escape. You can bring him hemostat and that will affect chris' story.

Sin 4: What kind of a sin is that? There were already zombies popped out from graveyards in re3, why cant recv have these type of zombies too?

Sin 5: How is your opinion about the game being terrible a sin of this game's story? And this is a special entry, an entry that's a spinoff. It was never meant to be re3. It was going to be re2 but capcom gave it a clever title about a sibling rivalry story. Also what a long convoluted ranting about an older game's mechanics. I played both versions and they work fine. Idk what you're talking about.

Sin 6: Stop mocking steve. He's just a kid with problems. People under 18 can act like that.

Sin 7: This joke sucked.

Sin 8: It's a big island. What kind of a question is that? Darkside chronicles also explains it.

Sin 9: So characters interacting with each other is a sin now?

Sin 10: It's umbrella. They design their facilities like that. Also DID YOU JUST SIN THE OP KNIFE?!!!! ????? Seriously that thing is so badass to use; it's meant to show chris' training on claire.

Sin 11: Even if it was; why would it be surprising? Stop mocking steve.

Sin 12: This is a common complaint ı've seen with this game's story. Claire didnt tell leon to find chris immediately cause she wanted him to protect sherry and take her into safety. She was worried about them and didnt want to get them into trouble. She later on contacted leon to find chris cause she found out info about umbrella monitoring chris and didnt know who else she could trust and contact with.

Sin 13: And this is a sin... How?

Sin 14: Mocking steve again... Leave the poor kid alone.

Sin 15: Mocking an older game's design again...

Sin 16: Repeating a previous sin for no real reason.

Sin 17: I disagree. Bowgun in recv is a good improvement from claire's weapon in re2. You can even fire explosive bolts. Personally ı would have liked to see an infinite ammo unlockable for the game but ı cant really blame the game cause it's a special spinoff and that works the game rather than against it. I dont need a re engine version for it.

Sin 18: You're just mocking a injured researcher for no real reason.

Sin 19: What the hell? Why did you sin this? This was meant to introduce ashford twins.

Sin 20: Cause she doesnt need to? They are simply displayed behind glasses and might not even behave as actual guns.

Sin 21: Mocking an older game's design again and again...

Sin 22: Why would he put the guns back? How else would he be able to defend himself without weapons?

Sin 23: And what else do you want her to do?

Sin 24: Percentage mechanic was introduced in re2 though. Re3 had it too. Besides steve could have just found out extra ammo. You could have criticised the weapons not being unlockables in main story.

Sin 25: Cause he prefers automatic guns? Also what? School shooter? That has to be the worst joke ı've ever heard. Also your sin counter just increased again for some reason.

Sin 27: Cause he wanted to mock his targets? Why are villains being blinded by their arrogance bother you to the point you describe it as a sin?

Sin 28: How is this sin a criticizing of his characterization exactly?

Sin 29: So you agree about claire mocking alfred? If so why sin it? You could have deducted a sin.

Sin 30: He could have done it off-screen when the cutscene was focusing on claire.

Sin 31: Alfred isnt gay at all. Also your mocking about sugimura who tragically passed away is extremely disgusting. Same thing with you also mocking suga for some twisted reason.

Sin 32: How many times are you going to sin an older game's design?

Sin 33: Re engine 3 had this monster though. It combined hunter gamma and grave digger into one, creating a weird chicken hybrid. Besides ı dont want re engine cv either way.

Sin 34: And that's a sin how?

Sin 35: It's just cheesy acting; you have no sense of humor.

Sin 36: He could have found them off-screen. Also a typo there about " lugars " when it's " lugers " .

Sin 37: What? It's self-aware; do you even know what you're talking about?

Sin 38: Mocking steve again...

Sin 39: And? It's just a gameplay mechanic.

Sin 40: How many times are you going to mock the new antagonist for their arrogance? Wouldnt it make more sense if you deducted sins? And stop saying alfred is gay.

Sin 41: Mocking steve again and again...

Sin 42: And that's a sin how? You can control more characters in previous entries.

Sin 43: You have some serious issues.

Sin 44: Your joke sucks.

Sin 45: Mocking an older game's acting for no real reason.

Sin 46: I agree that this was reckless but what else do you want him to do? People under stress can act like that. And mocking steve again...

Sin 47: What else do you want to be explained? And why would he mention his father again?

Sin 48: Cause of umbrella? Why wouldnt they design their facility like that?

Sin 49: I disagree. X scenes of recv devalue the game's story and it especially ruins re5's story even more. Same thing with wesker's report 1 which is also pointless. You could have sinned them without mentioning any positive. Besides if wesker was seen boring as to many, including to kenichi iwao who actually created the series; then he wouldnt have been revived from the dead. I still dislike x scenes though. " Who else are you going to root for? " Claire and chris? Anyone but wesker? I would have preferred alexia to just kill wesker or something.

( After an unnecessary sin reduction and 2 valid sins about wesker's portrayal in x scenes... )

Sin 50: Mocking an older game's design again and again and again...

Sin 51: Repeating sins about gameplay design again and again and again...

Sin 52: So not only you spoil the plot twist but you also mock the animation for some reason. Besides a speculation could be drawn about the music box playing a recording before the plot twist reveal. Did that not cross to your mind?

Sin 53: So it cant be both?

Sin 54: What a stupid joke.

Sin 55: What a pointless sin.

Sin 56: Mocking an older game's design again and again and again and again...

Sin 57: These sins are so repetitive. You dont even criticise the story, you criticise the game's design so that it wont be " remade " as if the game not getting a re engine treatment is a bad thing somehow.

Sin 58: He could have missed on purpose to toy with her.

Sin 59: One of the worst jokes ı've ever heard.

Sin 60: Cause his weapon might have run out of ammo? Along with his arrogance blinding him?

Sin 61: How many times are you going to mock the game's story with pointless sins?

Sin 62: I dont want a re engine version of it.

Sin 63: And this is a sin how?

Sin 64: There could have been other planes, including the ones that would carry t-virus which is the reason antarctic base gets infected.

Sin 65: His father could have trained him? Why is this so surprising? Chris and jill worked in air force and delta force respectively when they were quite young too.

Sin 66: This has to be the worst nitpick ı've ever seen.

Sin 67: Cause he was toying with them? Sending t-078 would decrease their chances of surviving. This is shown in gameplay since the boss fights with the tyrant, especially in plane are quite difficult. While inside the plane; 3 bow gas rounds and 2 acid rounds can defeat it fast before it would be launched.

Sin 68: What is your problem? They were showing signs of relief.

Sin 69: What kind of a sin is this? If she didnt want chris to come and reunite with her; then she wouldnt get herself into trouble on purpose in the 1st place. And ı dont think radio would even work, alfred might jam it up.

Sin 70: It has nails though. It could have followed claire off-screen and just grab onto the plane before opening the cockpit.

Sin 71: How is your opinion about this boss fight a sin of this game's story? If you knew how to fight it right from the start; wouldnt it be anti-climactic? The previous trick works well for it.

Sin 72: She was just mocking alfred. You could have deducted a sin.

Sin 73: Cause he wanted alexia to kill them in case he failed to do so? At least capture them? If he let them leave; that would have gotten alexia into trouble. He needed alexia's protection.

Sin 74: I agree that this scene is unnecessary but to give steve the benefit of doubt; he doesnt even kiss claire. He stops after claire starts to wake up. Idk why people mock that tragic kid over and over.

Sin 75: Yeah? Why is this so surprising? As if you cant blow nikolai's chopper in re3 or something.

Sin 76: Why would they die from a crash? That would be anti-climactic.

Sin 77: You're gross. He wanted to protect claire. And that redfield bloodline meme sucks.

Sin 78: The other planes carrying t-virus spread it all over the base. Due to an accident basically. And why wouldnt alfred want to do that?

Sin 79: Alexia? That was easy. Your mocking about the game's story doesnt make you any better.

Sin 80: This has to be one of the dumbest things ı've ever heard. How the hell can they escape from the back of the plane? They would have froze to death. Remember they are inside. They later find a snowmobile anyway.

Sin 81: I agree that this is also unnecessary but steve's meant to be a kid with mind issues. Stop mocking kids who have problems.

Sin 82: Cause she wants to save him? She didnt want him to die.

Sin 83: She does. You need to examine the hole in order to know the shape. You admit your sin is pointless and yet you still sin it. Pointless.

Sin 84: It does. She takes off the mask after the gas has been completely destroyed.

Sin 85: Why did you sin this awesome scene? You should have removed a sin.

Sin 86: He escaped cause of alfred's scream. He was affected by it.

Sin 87: I can. See sin 65.

Sin 88: I agree that they arent dressed properly for the weather but to give the game's story benefit; ı believe they dont complain cause of steve's love towards claire as well as claire's adoration towards her brother. They dont need to complain unnecessarily due to that, that would take away from the game's story.

Sin 89: Did you forget nosferatu attacking steve? Of course steve would have died from the fall due to that.

Sin 90: I agree that the sniper rifle is clunky but it's still a pretty good boss fight with unique scenes to kill nosferatu. Also you're complaining about an older game's design for some reason.

Sin 91: You didnt understand what he said at all. It was foreshadowing his tragic fate.

Sin 92: Why did you sin this? You should have removed a sin. And misspelling alfred's name as " alfed " for no real reason.

Sin 93: You pretty much answered yourself. She captured them in an attempt to toy with them as her experiments. She wasnt taking revenge on them, she doesnt love alfred nor anyone else. She's extremely selfish and egotistical who's portrayed as sympathetic due to her insane intelligence driving her insane to infinite heights.

Sin 94: What a pointless sin.

Sin 95: Why couldnt she? They were near their base.

Sin 96: It's not completely intact though. It's been heavily damaged. But ı agree that chris' rockfort section is unnecessary. Darkside chronicles solves that issue for me.

Sin 97: How is this a sin? It's a pretty good moment in the story. And you already criticised gulp worm before.

Sin 98: Repeating pointless sins.

Sin 99: Cause of her arrogance blinding her? Wesker could have shown it to the other monitors too.

Sin 100: You could have simply sinned wesker's changed line in x version and ı would have agreed with you.

Sin 101: You... Pretty much answered yourself.

Sin 102: Come on why did you sin this? He wanted chris to come to rockfort and he gets blinded by his arrogance. X version devalues this.

Sin 103: He pretty much explains it to chris. And he didnt say chris is the only ex-stars member who destroyed his plans. But ı agree that wesker's utilization in the stories set after re1 is quite barebones and that devalues him as well as valenfield's relationship.

Sin 104: You're still sinning this scene? Seriously?

Sin 105: You mean only chris? In og version; wesker doesnt attack claire. And alexia's charming voice influenced his mind.

Sin 106: He was in air force before joining stars. One of the worst if not the worst sin ever.

Sin 107: You pretty much answered yourself. And chris could have found antarctic base through checking one of v-tol's manuals or something. The facilities are connected.

Sin 108: Why? They are zombies. They can appear from anywhere.

Sin 109: Alexia didnt kill claire cause she wanted steve to kill her. She was using them as her experiments. And why does she need to know about chris? Your jokes suck.

Sin 110: You have some serious issues. You're just sinning redfield siblings' reunion for no real reason.

Sin 111: What a convoluted sin.

Sin 112: You're still pointlessly mocking this game's well crafted story. This video has no real reason to exist.

Sin 113: Your sinning video is stupid; not sugimura's or suga's writing. You're a disgusting sicko who mocks brilliant minds who did a lot of work for their scripts. Their story scripts didnt deserve the unnecessary criticisms at all.

Sin 114: You're still pointlessly mocking steve for no real reason. You need professional help.

Sin 115: Mocking an older game's design for yet another time that ı lost count how many.

Sin 116: You could have just sinned this and ı would have agreed with you. But it's not even that difficult to do like you're describing.

Sin 117: I dont think you understood alexia's intention at all. She wanted steve to attack and kill claire.

Sin 118: How is your opinion about this game's boss fight a sin of this game's story? I didnt even have much problem with this boss fight at all.

Sin 119: You're a disgusting sicko who mocks a small kid dying. I agree that him expressing his love is unnecessary but it was still a very emotional moment. And that line in rerev2 is a localization mistake. Claire doesnt reference it in og japanese script at all.

Sin 120: If you would have checked the files, you would understand it. And alexia dooming herself to failure is meant to be ironic. Her insane intelligence boost drove her insane and she didnt know what she was doing due to her arrogance blinding her to infinite heights.

Sin 121: Why is that a bad thing though? Kenichi iwao, the actual creator of the series who developed the scenario for re1, worked on that franchise as writer. I fail to see how sugimura playing tribute to him was a bad thing.

Sin 122: Why didnt you sin x version changing the game's story? I would have fully agreed with you!

Sin 123: What a pointless sin.

Sin 124: Chris told claire to go cause steve attacked her without chris being nearby and he wanted her to be in safety due to this. Suga expanded from sugimura's script by making redfield siblings fight steve together before fighting alexia as a coop sequence but sugimura's script still makes sense for what it is. Dismissing x version of course.

Sin 125: I agree about the weapon's mechanic being clunky but to be fair to the game; you only need to hit alexia once and she will get blown up.

Sin 126: Why are you mocking the protagonists? You could have just sinned x version altering sugimura's script due to kato's drunken nonsense.

Sin 127: Yes it does. T-veronica comes back in darkside chronicles 4 years later before re6 gives the screentime it deserves along with g-virus. Suga was expanding from sugimura's script properly. Better than re code plagas spinoff like games that are presented as numbered entries.

Sin 128: You're a disgusting idiot, you're just mocking the game's story due to wesker pissing off claire for an unnecessary reason. You could have just sinned x version's alterations and ı would have agreed with you.

Sin 129: Chris along with jill encounters wesker in prelude to the fall manga which is a prequel to umbrella chronicles' 2003 portion.

Sin 130: What about dead aim? That's the 1st actual game in the series that takes place at a year set after 1998. Re4 isnt even the 1st game that does a year time skip. And umbrella didnt even receive the proper conclusion anyway, the revival plot comes out of nowhere in re4 due to x version altering sugimura's script. I'm sure kato would have been happy by his crappy fanfiction being taken seriously.

This video is as bad as your 1st re video about re6 if NOT WORSE! I managed to pretty much respond all of your sins which is surely saying something. Even at your video about re6; ı still struggled to respond some of them properly. I'm sure the counterpoint video that will be released in the future as a respond to yours will improve from my essay very well.
1. Code Veronica is very underrated RE game, but then again i have lost hope on Capcom remaking CV because they would rush it out like they did with RE3R and only remake RE4 because it was the most popular back in 2000s.

2. Yeah, "Roidfield" became a meme starting in RE5 and its getting old. As for Claire, i'm guessing she found clues about her brother being in Paris Facility only to arrive too late and gets capture

3. Rodrigo was bleeding badly and pretty much lost all the hope since the prison was taken over. I'm guessing he let Claire out to give her chance to escape from death but also basically telling her that its hopeless to get off the island. He does warm up to her and tells her to escape if you bring hemostat like you said

4. It does beg the question how are they coming out of their graves since it was stated that T-Virus doesn't infect dead tissue? It only infects when you are alive and you become "dead" and "reanimate" as a zombie. I'm guessing the zombies you see coming out of the graves in RE3 had recently died and buried, but CV zombies look like they have been buried for several weeks or months.

5. I guess Dartigan is too much stuck in the past which would be no surprise. I personally liked the 3D environments, which was already used in a game called Dino Crisis 1 on PS1(One of my favourite PS1 games)

6. Personally, i don't mind Steve as much as other people. Sure, his voice can be annoying to some, but his character isn't mean-spirited or evil.

7. Agreed. Steve "Canadian" joke has expired long ago

8. Either Dartigan didn't bother to look for research or he has such narrow-minded view on all the prisons. That being said, i'd wager that Steve escaped somehow from his cell

9. I'm guessing he is criticizing Claire and Steve being some "stereotypical archetypes" in movies, but i'm not exactly sure where is he basing their relationship on.

10. No argument there. Plus, the knife in Code Veronica is my favourite knife design. It looks like similar to one in Rambo

11. To my knowledge i thought Steve just stumbled upon the file on Chris Redfield on computer rather than actively searching about Claire

12. Since the game takes place 1998, internet wasn't the most popular thing at the time and Claire couldn't contact Chris directly and Leon has government connections to send info to Chris.

13. His points bugged me too

14. I've seen characters much, much worse than Steve

15. That's actually classic RE tradition.

16. Unless, he can't see forest for the trees, finding right key for the right door should not be difficult.

17. Bow Gun is certainly upgraded since RE2, though the only nitpick would be that it shoots only one arrow at the time instead of 3(RE2) but explosive arrows certainly make up for it

18. To be fair, that seems to be cliche in most horror movies where someone randomly pops out of nowhere. Was this guy crawling on the ground this whole time? Also, it seems his head was grabbed by Bandersnatch and slammed him against the glass but once you get in the room, there is no Bandersnatch.

19. Its weird that film projector would unlock secret door, unless Alfred really wants anyone who stumbles upon to place to appreciate their relationship, but like you said, it introduces Ashford twins and their weird, creepy incestuous looks to each other.

20. I think this is case of Gameplay and Story Segregation. Golden lugers are obviously key items to progress in the game

21. "Why would it deactivate if you put it back" To prevent someone stealing your gun that only you have access to it?

22. I'm guessing Steve didn't know that putting them back will shut it off and was panicking, but i think the actual sin is how the hell Steve get in there without seeing Claire.

23. It's gameplay design

24. I think Steve used up all the ammo on Bandersnatch to save Claire from it

25. School shooter? Nah, more like little bit careless

27. That unfortunately is the common trope of RE villains to be full of themselves and super arrogant.

28. He is more like Norman Bates, but with high pitched voice

29. To be fair, that animation looks kinda hilarious. It's almost like he is practicing his dance moves XD

30. If they wanted to indicate Alfred reloading his sniper rifle, there should have been at least sound of round entering the chamber but there isn't.

31. To be fair, Alfred has very flamboyant voice but yeah, he is no gay.

32. My only complaint about this is the massive amount of backtracking you get to do more than in previous games.

33. Well, the way they handled RE3R,i would not be surprised if they cut the worm boss from the CV remake

34. Because laser sights don't cause heating or any feel from few meters away until like several minutes later, so Claire shouldn't even be feeling she is being targeted. But with everything what's going on, it would make sense Claire to be wary about being watched and being shot at.

35. Ummm...humor is subjective...i guess? But Alfred's lines are definitely typical RE levels of charm.

36. No argument there

37. Judging by the beginning of CV, we see Claire take out guards in slow-mo that looks like very nod to John Woo films so it is quite self-aware

38. Steve looks like he has thing for automatics more

39. No argument there. He almost sounds like Spoony One now

40. No argument there

41. Well, Steve is kinda careless but that's one of his characteristics.

42. Sadly playing as Steve was much more shorter than with Carlos in RE3

43. That was really bad joke on his part. That being said Steve wastes almost entire clip for being angry.

44. To me its weird that the floor suddenly collapses on them without hearing it breaking

45. I think what people really have issue is with Steve's grating voice than the actual bad lines.

46. It's a miracle that Claire was unhurt by Steve's shooting, though his reaction to shooting his zombified father makes sense. I've seen people often disliking this scene because of how it was delivered/executed.

47. To be fair, it would have been neat to see how was Steve and his father's relationship before all the shit went down. But i can understand why he won't bring him again because it would re-open his wounds.

48. Umbrella being Umbrella

49. IIRC, Wesker was originally going to stay dead, but they decided to bring him back. Although i kinda miss Richard Waugh's Wesker, Alexia bitchslapping Wesker around was actually kinda funny until CVX changed it to Wesker fighting back.

50. Once again...Umbrella being Umbrella or in this case, Ashfords

51. Check the part 50.

52. Well, that is all speculation and not actually confirmed nor hinted at. Also the music boxes we see here look like 1800s Music boxes that play instruments, not spoken words or recordings of someone else's conversations

53. I don't know anyone who has window in bedroom to look through corridor or living room, but this is the Ashfords were are talking about

54. I would be terrified hydraulic press bed that would crush me if i were asleep

55. Typical survival horror trope

56. Read previous one

57. Once again...Umbrella err i mean Ashfords being Ashfords

58. Seems to be trend with lot of the baddies in RE. Toying instead of outright killing the protagonist

59. Explains why Ashfords couldn't keep away from each other

60. Although his mistake was to give away his position by yelling while attacking them

61. No argument there

62. At least he wasn't sneaking into the room with Claire's showering

63. Classic RE self-destruction

64. It would be hassle in real life, but it's a video game

65. Well, here is the difference. It was already established in Chris's background that he was in the Air Force since RE1, so he does get pass on that. Steve's father on the other hand was established as researcher for Umbrella that tried to steal information and sell it to the highest bidder. Sure, Steve could've learned to fly plane from his father but it isn't exactly clear about it.

66. Pointless nitpick i agree

67. I took that as him trying to either slow or/and sent Tyrant to kill them. Besides, Alfred had to focus on his own escape as well.

68. I think there was more than just relief on their looks but that's just me

69. Because Chris is going to arrive at Rockfort Island when Claire has already left that place so he ends up there for nothing as it happens in the game. As for the radio, yeah Alfred probably had it jammed since he manages to control the plane to head to Antartica but they didn't know that.

70. They were on the air quite while, unless Tyrant really managed jump that high to catch it

71. Took me less than hour once i figured out the pattern

72. I think he was mocking Claire's line delivery

73. I think Alfred had upper hand there, though.

74. It shouldn't require Claire waking up for Steve to snap and think "Ok, this was stupid". Also, trauma does not excuse for bad behaviour or being uncomfortable.

75. That's because you shoot Nikolai's chopper with rocket launcher

76. Because real life physics say otherwise. Also, if the characters keep surviving everything thrown at them without any repercussions, then how we are supposed to fear for their survival?

77. No argument there. Redfield Bloodline meme can die in fire

78. If Alfred wants to protect Alexia at all costs, what would zombies accomplish exactly? Not to mention, when were introduced to him he complained about his base being attacked and people turning into zombies

79. Maybe Alexia wants perfect candidate to wield that axe. Foreshadowing

80. Well, they don't really complain about cold later on when they are fighting Nosferatu on the roof during cold blizzard

81. He is a kid with hormones

82. That was pretty harsh by Dartigan

83. No argument there. You have to literally examine the size before doing the operation like you said

84. It would take gas for at least few minutes to completely dissipate from the room even if you turned it off from pump.

85. To me it looked like Alfred is just terrible shot.

86. No argument there

87. Again, "could've" or "would've" situation

88. I don't see how.

89. No argument

90. Sniper kill is actually satisfying to pull off....but knife is even more satisfying

91. No argument there

92. It's well made scene, ngl

93. No argument there

94. I agree

95. If i recall, there were multiple monitors there. It's just Dartigan nitpicking the hell out of it

96. I was expecting bigger destruction on Rockfort Island. Only few spots were badly damaged and that's about it. Its mostly Chris learning that Wesker is alive and Claire is somewhere in Antartica

97. I personally prefer Yawn fight over this

98. Sub-machineguns are actually one of the best weapons against Alexia's second form

99. It seemed like Alexia was singing for losing Alfred and based on her lyrics was about them

100. IIRC, Wesker sounded more surprised of Chris's appearance in CV

101. Classic RE tradition

102. Not in the original CV where he sounds quite surprised "Chris! You're here?!"

103. Putting UC aside in which had Red Queen screwing Wesker over for not being able to obtain combat data, Wesker seems specifically fixated on Chris and him in the sequels than any other S.T.A.R.S member

104. Its chilling to see Wesker return, but i always found the rivalry between Chris and Wesker as mighty forced.

105. No argument there. Though its more frequent with Chris

106. I agree. It was in the manual for crying out loud

107. Yup

108. Rotten and decayed zombies that are buried in thick ice should not child's play for them

109. Considering that Alexia has thing with infecting others it would make sense she would want to infect both Claire and Steve, but Chris got there in time.

110. Usually community makes fun of Claire's taste in men

111. No argument there

112. Mind elaborating a bit what makes this story great instead of just saying "It's well-crafted story and this video should not exist)?

113. That doesn't mean people can't be criticised for their work if that's what you are going for. Criticising someone's work is not the same as attacking someone in person as long as its constructive criticism.

114. No argument there

115. Gameplay mechanic

116. This was annoying part ngl

117. Somebody's gonna wield that axe

118. I wouldn't exactly call this a boss fight but chase sequence

119. Steve's death would be saddest moment in the series...if it weren't for the fact Claire's uncanny crying face that always bugged the hell out of me even for first time playing. Granted, it was 2000 game

120. Guess no argument there

121. I love Parasite Eve

122. Guess people really wanted to see Wesker fight back

123. Classic RE Tradition

124. Unfortunately, didn't happen in final product

125. It can be quite hassle though

126. I have no words

127. T-Veronica does come back in some fashion, but not Steve. Its likely that he stays dead

128. Come to think of it, Wesker making Steve into brainwashed ally of his would hurt Claire even more

129. Let alone in Lost in Nightmares before Chris and Sheva

130. Or Revelations which chronologically took place before RE5. Though it was mistake taking Umbrella off-screen.
 
1. Code Veronica is very underrated RE game, but then again i have lost hope on Capcom remaking CV because they would rush it out like they did with RE3R and only remake RE4 because it was the most popular back in 2000s.

2. Yeah, "Roidfield" became a meme starting in RE5 and its getting old. As for Claire, i'm guessing she found clues about her brother being in Paris Facility only to arrive too late and gets capture

3. Rodrigo was bleeding badly and pretty much lost all the hope since the prison was taken over. I'm guessing he let Claire out to give her chance to escape from death but also basically telling her that its hopeless to get off the island. He does warm up to her and tells her to escape if you bring hemostat like you said

4. It does beg the question how are they coming out of their graves since it was stated that T-Virus doesn't infect dead tissue? It only infects when you are alive and you become "dead" and "reanimate" as a zombie. I'm guessing the zombies you see coming out of the graves in RE3 had recently died and buried, but CV zombies look like they have been buried for several weeks or months.

5. I guess Dartigan is too much stuck in the past which would be no surprise. I personally liked the 3D environments, which was already used in a game called Dino Crisis 1 on PS1(One of my favourite PS1 games)

6. Personally, i don't mind Steve as much as other people. Sure, his voice can be annoying to some, but his character isn't mean-spirited or evil.

7. Agreed. Steve "Canadian" joke has expired long ago

8. Either Dartigan didn't bother to look for research or he has such narrow-minded view on all the prisons. That being said, i'd wager that Steve escaped somehow from his cell

9. I'm guessing he is criticizing Claire and Steve being some "stereotypical archetypes" in movies, but i'm not exactly sure where is he basing their relationship on.

10. No argument there. Plus, the knife in Code Veronica is my favourite knife design. It looks like similar to one in Rambo

11. To my knowledge i thought Steve just stumbled upon the file on Chris Redfield on computer rather than actively searching about Claire

12. Since the game takes place 1998, internet wasn't the most popular thing at the time and Claire couldn't contact Chris directly and Leon has government connections to send info to Chris.

13. His points bugged me too

14. I've seen characters much, much worse than Steve

15. That's actually classic RE tradition.

16. Unless, he can't see forest for the trees, finding right key for the right door should not be difficult.

17. Bow Gun is certainly upgraded since RE2, though the only nitpick would be that it shoots only one arrow at the time instead of 3(RE2) but explosive arrows certainly make up for it

18. To be fair, that seems to be cliche in most horror movies where someone randomly pops out of nowhere. Was this guy crawling on the ground this whole time? Also, it seems his head was grabbed by Bandersnatch and slammed him against the glass but once you get in the room, there is no Bandersnatch.

19. Its weird that film projector would unlock secret door, unless Alfred really wants anyone who stumbles upon to place to appreciate their relationship, but like you said, it introduces Ashford twins and their weird, creepy incestuous looks to each other.

20. I think this is case of Gameplay and Story Segregation. Golden lugers are obviously key items to progress in the game

21. "Why would it deactivate if you put it back" To prevent someone stealing your gun that only you have access to it?

22. I'm guessing Steve didn't know that putting them back will shut it off and was panicking, but i think the actual sin is how the hell Steve get in there without seeing Claire.

23. It's gameplay design

24. I think Steve used up all the ammo on Bandersnatch to save Claire from it

25. School shooter? Nah, more like little bit careless

27. That unfortunately is the common trope of RE villains to be full of themselves and super arrogant.

28. He is more like Norman Bates, but with high pitched voice

29. To be fair, that animation looks kinda hilarious. It's almost like he is practicing his dance moves XD

30. If they wanted to indicate Alfred reloading his sniper rifle, there should have been at least sound of round entering the chamber but there isn't.

31. To be fair, Alfred has very flamboyant voice but yeah, he is no gay.

32. My only complaint about this is the massive amount of backtracking you get to do more than in previous games.

33. Well, the way they handled RE3R,i would not be surprised if they cut the worm boss from the CV remake

34. Because laser sights don't cause heating or any feel from few meters away until like several minutes later, so Claire shouldn't even be feeling she is being targeted. But with everything what's going on, it would make sense Claire to be wary about being watched and being shot at.

35. Ummm...humor is subjective...i guess? But Alfred's lines are definitely typical RE levels of charm.

36. No argument there

37. Judging by the beginning of CV, we see Claire take out guards in slow-mo that looks like very nod to John Woo films so it is quite self-aware

38. Steve looks like he has thing for automatics more

39. No argument there. He almost sounds like Spoony One now

40. No argument there

41. Well, Steve is kinda careless but that's one of his characteristics.

42. Sadly playing as Steve was much more shorter than with Carlos in RE3

43. That was really bad joke on his part. That being said Steve wastes almost entire clip for being angry.

44. To me its weird that the floor suddenly collapses on them without hearing it breaking

45. I think what people really have issue is with Steve's grating voice than the actual bad lines.

46. It's a miracle that Claire was unhurt by Steve's shooting, though his reaction to shooting his zombified father makes sense. I've seen people often disliking this scene because of how it was delivered/executed.

47. To be fair, it would have been neat to see how was Steve and his father's relationship before all the shit went down. But i can understand why he won't bring him again because it would re-open his wounds.

48. Umbrella being Umbrella

49. IIRC, Wesker was originally going to stay dead, but they decided to bring him back. Although i kinda miss Richard Waugh's Wesker, Alexia bitchslapping Wesker around was actually kinda funny until CVX changed it to Wesker fighting back.

50. Once again...Umbrella being Umbrella or in this case, Ashfords

51. Check the part 50.

52. Well, that is all speculation and not actually confirmed nor hinted at. Also the music boxes we see here look like 1800s Music boxes that play instruments, not spoken words or recordings of someone else's conversations

53. I don't know anyone who has window in bedroom to look through corridor or living room, but this is the Ashfords were are talking about

54. I would be terrified hydraulic press bed that would crush me if i were asleep

55. Typical survival horror trope

56. Read previous one

57. Once again...Umbrella err i mean Ashfords being Ashfords

58. Seems to be trend with lot of the baddies in RE. Toying instead of outright killing the protagonist

59. Explains why Ashfords couldn't keep away from each other

60. Although his mistake was to give away his position by yelling while attacking them

61. No argument there

62. At least he wasn't sneaking into the room with Claire's showering

63. Classic RE self-destruction

64. It would be hassle in real life, but it's a video game

65. Well, here is the difference. It was already established in Chris's background that he was in the Air Force since RE1, so he does get pass on that. Steve's father on the other hand was established as researcher for Umbrella that tried to steal information and sell it to the highest bidder. Sure, Steve could've learned to fly plane from his father but it isn't exactly clear about it.

66. Pointless nitpick i agree

67. I took that as him trying to either slow or/and sent Tyrant to kill them. Besides, Alfred had to focus on his own escape as well.

68. I think there was more than just relief on their looks but that's just me

69. Because Chris is going to arrive at Rockfort Island when Claire has already left that place so he ends up there for nothing as it happens in the game. As for the radio, yeah Alfred probably had it jammed since he manages to control the plane to head to Antartica but they didn't know that.

70. They were on the air quite while, unless Tyrant really managed jump that high to catch it

71. Took me less than hour once i figured out the pattern

72. I think he was mocking Claire's line delivery

73. I think Alfred had upper hand there, though.

74. It shouldn't require Claire waking up for Steve to snap and think "Ok, this was stupid". Also, trauma does not excuse for bad behaviour or being uncomfortable.

75. That's because you shoot Nikolai's chopper with rocket launcher

76. Because real life physics say otherwise. Also, if the characters keep surviving everything thrown at them without any repercussions, then how we are supposed to fear for their survival?

77. No argument there. Redfield Bloodline meme can die in fire

78. If Alfred wants to protect Alexia at all costs, what would zombies accomplish exactly? Not to mention, when were introduced to him he complained about his base being attacked and people turning into zombies

79. Maybe Alexia wants perfect candidate to wield that axe. Foreshadowing

80. Well, they don't really complain about cold later on when they are fighting Nosferatu on the roof during cold blizzard

81. He is a kid with hormones

82. That was pretty harsh by Dartigan

83. No argument there. You have to literally examine the size before doing the operation like you said

84. It would take gas for at least few minutes to completely dissipate from the room even if you turned it off from pump.

85. To me it looked like Alfred is just terrible shot.

86. No argument there

87. Again, "could've" or "would've" situation

88. I don't see how.

89. No argument

90. Sniper kill is actually satisfying to pull off....but knife is even more satisfying

91. No argument there

92. It's well made scene, ngl

93. No argument there

94. I agree

95. If i recall, there were multiple monitors there. It's just Dartigan nitpicking the hell out of it

96. I was expecting bigger destruction on Rockfort Island. Only few spots were badly damaged and that's about it. Its mostly Chris learning that Wesker is alive and Claire is somewhere in Antartica

97. I personally prefer Yawn fight over this

98. Sub-machineguns are actually one of the best weapons against Alexia's second form

99. It seemed like Alexia was singing for losing Alfred and based on her lyrics was about them

100. IIRC, Wesker sounded more surprised of Chris's appearance in CV

101. Classic RE tradition

102. Not in the original CV where he sounds quite surprised "Chris! You're here?!"

103. Putting UC aside in which had Red Queen screwing Wesker over for not being able to obtain combat data, Wesker seems specifically fixated on Chris and him in the sequels than any other S.T.A.R.S member

104. Its chilling to see Wesker return, but i always found the rivalry between Chris and Wesker as mighty forced.

105. No argument there. Though its more frequent with Chris

106. I agree. It was in the manual for crying out loud

107. Yup

108. Rotten and decayed zombies that are buried in thick ice should not child's play for them

109. Considering that Alexia has thing with infecting others it would make sense she would want to infect both Claire and Steve, but Chris got there in time.

110. Usually community makes fun of Claire's taste in men

111. No argument there

112. Mind elaborating a bit what makes this story great instead of just saying "It's well-crafted story and this video should not exist)?

113. That doesn't mean people can't be criticised for their work if that's what you are going for. Criticising someone's work is not the same as attacking someone in person as long as its constructive criticism.

114. No argument there

115. Gameplay mechanic

116. This was annoying part ngl

117. Somebody's gonna wield that axe

118. I wouldn't exactly call this a boss fight but chase sequence

119. Steve's death would be saddest moment in the series...if it weren't for the fact Claire's uncanny crying face that always bugged the hell out of me even for first time playing. Granted, it was 2000 game

120. Guess no argument there

121. I love Parasite Eve

122. Guess people really wanted to see Wesker fight back

123. Classic RE Tradition

124. Unfortunately, didn't happen in final product

125. It can be quite hassle though

126. I have no words

127. T-Veronica does come back in some fashion, but not Steve. Its likely that he stays dead

128. Come to think of it, Wesker making Steve into brainwashed ally of his would hurt Claire even more

129. Let alone in Lost in Nightmares before Chris and Sheva

130. Or Revelations which chronologically took place before RE5. Though it was mistake taking Umbrella off-screen.
Interesting, thanks a lot for creating your essay as a reply to mine. You make good points. Though ı disagree with some and ı'll share another one that ı created as a reply to yours.

1. I dont think it's underrated at all. It seems to be quite liked by the fanbase to the point a lot of people consider it mainline despite it not carrying a number and ask for a " remake " . It's a spinoff along with this being considered by one of the devs and ı dont find the whole " re(x, insert any word here) " concept that interesting anymore.


" I was relieved to know that Code Veronica was a spin-off, not an official numbered title. "

4. I dont remember t-virus' development well as much as progenitor, g-virus, t-veronica and c-virus but from my understanding; the zombies popping out from the ground in recv seems to be buried alive. But ı dont think the graveyards zombies were well explained neither for re3 nor for recv. If dartigan criticised both games' properly, ı might have agreed but he seems to sin it for the sake of it.

29. That's why he should have deducted a sin, mainly due to alyson court's well delivery.

49. Kenichi iwao planned to bring him back from the dead way before. I would have preferred if the actual creator of the series stayed, he might have helped developers for the future entries' story development. And ı dislike x alterations with a passion.


" Out of curiosity — did you plan for Wesker to survive? "

" Yes, we had plans to use him again down the line, since the T-Virus can revive people from the dead. "

52. You have a point but the series along with the technology presented in it is more advanced than real life's. I still see that possible and if recv was my 1st entry, ı might have speculated that out or something. With re engine 2 and 3; the problem ı have isnt that umbrella's technology is more advanced than real life but that they are more advanced than neo-umbrella's technology in re6. I would rather stick to the simulation theory as a way to tie them up to umbrella corps cause re engine raccoon games being set in 1998 make no sense.

65. True but ı dont think chris' backstory was explained in re1's files either. From what ı remember; it seems to be explained in guidebooks. Same thing with jill. Regardless the point ı tried to make was for re series; young people can perform things which realistically speaking would be way out of place for their age. I still steve flying a plane possible despite him being under 18. Ashley was 20 in re4 but ı find her controlling a bulldozer more out of place even if it makes for an interesting spectacle.

68. It might be for steve who was loving claire but it was one-sided. Claire was concerned about her brother while not having any feelings despite the chemistry between the 2. This is even more obvious in darkside chronicles.

69. True but if they stayed there, they would have got blown up. And alfred manages to control the plane so using a radio would still not work, it might have been even jammed before they escaped using that. I wouldnt mind it if claire reunited with chris on rockfort and one of the files for re6 straight up says that despite it being a mistake. I took that as chris downplaying his past adventures on purpose due to his depression. Same thing with " 3 years " or " I'm the one who killed him ( wesker ) when sheva also fired a rocket. " .

72. And that makes the sin even worse.

76. I dont think real life physics work well for re series. The premise has always been quite fantastical, even more so due to progenitor virus creating all life on earth in the most insane way possible. The premise escalation started with re2 anyway. I'm not saying characters should be portrayed as completely invincible but they should still be able to survive against odds which realistically would be fatal to them. This is shown best in re6 and that's yet another reason why ı absolutely adore the game in pretty much every single way imaginable.

78. You make a good point. No disagreement.

80. True but alexia might have straight up killed them using her pods if they try to escape using running without finding a vehicle. They found a snowmobile after nosferatu fight and that seems to increase their chances of survival.

84. Well he seems to criticise claire not being affected which is explained by the gas completely disappearing rather than sinning the environment. When steve causes the accident; the gas starts to leak anyway. If he criticised that about the characters not dying; then ı guess it would have been fine. Maybe the cold weather might decrease gas' lethality or something.

88. Cause like ı said, that would take away from the game's story. A few lines would have been fine ı guess but if they complained over and over like re engine 2's take on claire and leon where they can shout a random dialogue during gameplay out of nowhere, ı think it would have been annoying.

109. She didnt want to infect claire cause she preferred steve to be infected 1st. She wanted steve to hurt claire but his love towards claire caused steve to break free from alexia's control.

112. Cause in my opinion it's a well crafted sibling rivalry story due to claire and chris' struggles against alfred and alexia. I agree that the game's development is quite flawed but it's a spinoff, being the 1st one in the series, and ı cant blame the game much for that. I find re3's and recv's story premises more focused than re2.

113. You're right but the way dartigan criticised recv's ( and for this 1st re video; re6 ) story still makes him quite insufferable. I just cant stand to overblown negativity, that's all. Describing things simply as " stupid " or " terrible " isnt a proper way to look at things imo. And this video pointlessly repeats sins over and over.

119. For me it is along with piers' and merah's sacrifices in re6 and marhawa desire respectively.

127. And he should cause that would ruin his sacrifice. Same thing with piers.

128. I'm not interested for that. I cant stand jill becoming wesker's slave in re5 at all.

I think this is it. I admit that ı went overboard when ı created my essay against dartigan's video on recv to the point of making insults against his video but ı just cant stand to the way dartigan criticises things at all.
 
Last edited:
As long as we can respect each other's point of view without judging one one another then its all good. We have all our preferences. Thanks for the reply though :)

As for my comment about "CV is underrated" i meant that when it comes to Capcom because they love milking RE4 for some reason but its loved by community
 
Top Bottom